Showing posts with label Somalia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Somalia. Show all posts

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Current Events & Trends Detroit: only one of America's debt-ridden cities

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.


At one time America's fourth most populous city hosting automakers General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, the Motor City has lost 63 percent of its population since 1950. Although there are some signs of renewal in its inner city, downward trends have been obvious for decades. Crime, government corruption, financial scandals plus dysfunctional family life have all played their role in Detroit's slide into bankruptcy.
But as The Economist recently pointed out beneath a recent headline: “It's not just Detroit . American cities and states must promise less or face disaster” (“America's Public Finances: The Unsteady States of America,” July 27, 2013).
The Financial Times added, “While Detroit is an extreme example of urban decay, its predicament sheds light on similar problems that afflict a number of US cities” (cover teaser for “Detroit: Descent Into Despair,” July 26).
Time magazine revealed that Birmingham, New Orleans and Philadelphia are among the foremost examples of cities with serious debt obligations in the millions (Aug. 5). Primary blame has been assigned to pensions, but society having gone awry in its fundamental relationships between people must figure heavily in such severe debt problems.
City governments wind up footing the costs of sin —both social and monetary. And ultimately, individual taxpayers and private business pick up the tab. As the Economist article concluded, “America's dynamic private sector is carrying on its back an unreformed Leviathan . Detroit is merely a symptom of that.” (Sources: The Economist, Financial Times, Time. )

You might also be interested in...

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

A Page on the World... Infidel

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.

Infidel is a remarkable book by a remarkable person. It's unusual that someone less than 40 years old would have lived a life worthy of an autobiography, but Ayaan Hirsi Ali certainly has. You might not have heard or remembered her name, but you are likely aware of the brutal murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh in November 2004 at the hands of a radical Muslim. Van Gogh produced an 11-minute documentary titled Submission about the inherent abuse of women in the Islamic faith.
We wrote of the murder and its implications in several articles in World News and Prophecy starting in December 2004. After shooting his victim, then cutting his throat nearly to decapitation, the assassin stabbed a note to van Gogh's chest. The note was a fatwa-like assassination order against the woman who wrote the screenplay—Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Ali was, at the time, a member of the Dutch parliament. Little publicized outside of Holland, subsequent events threw the tiny nation into turmoil and eventually led Ali to write her extraordinary autobiography.
She now lives in the United States, but she came to Holland from Kenya, where she lived with her grandmother, mother and sister as refugees from war-torn Somalia. The family also lived for a time in Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia. She provides an insightful perception of the different approaches to Islam in the indigenous cultures and tribes.
Islam's oppression of women
Principally, Infidel is the story of Islam's effect upon women, told from the point of view of Somalis, where female circumcision is still practiced. Living in Saudi Arabia as a young girl in the 1970s, Ali also offers sharp insights into life as a woman under Islam in the Wahhabi tradition. In Kenya, as a teen, she was drawn to the radical Muslim Brotherhood, learning its violent philosophy from imams sponsored by Egypt and Saudi Arabia. She experienced and witnessed the routine beatings of women and children, as well as the facelessness of a female in the Islamic culture.
Yet, she did not rebel against her culture for a long time, not until her father arranged a marriage for her to a man she did not know and did not want to marry. Arranged marriages were—are—the norms in Islam. Her husband-to-be was Canadian, and while she was en route to Canada from Kenya to marry him, she sought asylum in Holland. She assimilated into the Dutch culture, as well as its politics, receiving a university education and eventually being elected to parliament.
Throughout it all, she struggled with her Muslim training, testing its assertions against what she witnessed in the West. She had been brought up to believe that only an Islamic government could produce a harmonious society, but she saw countries in Europe that were arguably better-ordered, cleaner and healthier than any of the Muslim nations in which she had lived. Moreover, the way the women of Europe were able to live was a universe away from Muslim practice.
She struggled with the Islamic mentality toward its women, concluding repeatedly that it did not fit the modern world. Even as a teen, she dared to question her imams, seeking the “why” behind the Koranic rules. As an adult, especially after moving to Holland, she openly debated those willing to address her questions. She could not find the relevancy within Islam that she believed the modern world requires. So she left the faith.
However, she did not leave her passionate desire to see the way of life for Muslim women improved. She grieved over the circumcision of young Somali girls that she knew continued even in the immigrant Somali communities of West. She had firsthand knowledge of it in Holland. (Female circumcision isn't a tenet of Islam, but the imams don't forbid it either. It's the remnant of an ignorant nomadic superstition.)
She describes as common throughout Islam the brutal subjugation of women, including arranged marriages, beatings by their husbands and the expectation that they will forever be quietly in the background of a male-dominated culture.
It is doubtful that she will bring about any change within Islam. Devout Muslims view her as a heretic; even her family cut off all contact with her. Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, says Ali is “just another Muslim basher on the lecture circuit” (Neely Tucker, “True Believer,” Washington Post, March 7, 2007, p. C01).
Armed body guards travel with Ali wherever she goes; they have ever since the murder of van Gogh.
Three principal lessons
The book itself is excellent writing, moving quickly along through dynamic and tragic stories. There are three outstanding points to draw from it. The first is the insight into how shockingly different the cultures of Somalia, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia and Kenya are from the West. Ali's grandmother literally lived in the Stone Age, married to a nomad and surviving off the desert; she was forced into an arranged marriage to an older man when she was 10 years old.
The second point springs from the first: That part of the world is still largely conscious of tribes, clans and families. The book opens with Ali's recitation of her ancestors, something that her grandmother had her do repeatedly. Whenever one met a stranger, the first thing they did was recite their family lines, usually to discover some common ancestor. Clans automatically helped fellow clan members with food, shelter or whatever else was needed.
When all else fails—as when Somalia overthrew its communist government—people return to their tribal identity. Sadly, that country exploded into intertribal warfare, propelling hundreds of thousands of refugees over the borders of neighboring countries.
Clearly, any international policies regarding the Middle East must be knowledgeable about tribal configurations, not merely national boundaries. Failing to fully understand and plan around this reality has frustrated the American-led coalition in Iraq.
The third point is the most important. It has to do with Ali's reaction to the 9/11 terror assault on the United States. When she heard of the attacks, her first reaction was, “Please don't let the attackers be Muslims.” Her worst fears were confirmed when she learned that that the terrorists were indeed Muslims. Ali bristled at the ignorance in analyses that claimed the attacks sprang from Islamic frustrations about Palestine, Israel or Western morals.
Terrorist attacks “were about belief”
“It was about belief,” she wrote, bluntly. Articles “about Islam being a religion of peace and tolerance, not the slightest bit violent…were fairy tales, nothing to do with the real world I knew…People theorized about poverty pushing people to terrorism; about colonialism and consumerism, pop culture and Western decadence… None of this pseudointellectualism had anything to do with reality” (p. 270).
Addressing the theory that American support for Israel and Arab frustration over Palestinian issues motivated the attacks, Ali scoffed that the attackers weren't Palestinian men. None left letters about Palestine. “This was belief, I thought. Not frustration, colonialism, or Israel: it was about a religious belief, a one-way ticket to Heaven” (ibid.).
Questions, doubts and challenges she had mentally collected about Islam now flooded Ali's mind. She wrote that she came to realize, “We froze the moral outlook of billions of people into the mind-set of the Arab desert in the seventh century” (p. 272).
She sees Islam as unwilling to bring the faith into the modern world. Equally, she sees the West as unwilling to perceive Islam for what it is. Commenting on a European Social Democrat Parties conference whose attendees “seemed to think it would be easy to set up the institutions for a European Islam in peace and harmony. They seemed clouded by wishful thinking rather than operating with rigorous analysis” (p. 278).
She was commenting on the fact that European Islamic communities are retaining their cultures, with their unacceptable and troublesome components. They are not integrating into Europe's culture, and they are retaining their deeply held religious convictions.
One of the changes she pushed for in Holland was the registration of “honor killings”—murders of Islamic women by family members over acts that they believe dishonored the family. Homicide statistics did not reflect this category until Ali lobbied the justice minister to try a pilot project in just two of the 25 regions in Holland. Monitoring honor killings revealed 11 in only seven months!
Such murders occur by the multiple thousands throughout the Muslim world, as well as within insular immigrant communities in Western countries. “Honor killings occur for a variety of offenses, including allegations of premarital or extramarital sex, refusing an arranged marriage, attempting to obtain a divorce, or simply talking with a man. If a woman brings shame to the family, her male relatives are bound by duty and culture to kill her” (James Emery, “Reputation Is Everything: Honor Killing Among the Palestinians,” www.worldandi.com, 2003).
The most explosive charge she leveled at Islam was in regard to the “marriage” of the prophet Muhammad, then in his 50s, to a 9-year-old girl. Ali pointed out to the Dutch authorities that he would be a pedophile by modern legal standards. Her comparison was a firebomb to devout Muslims.
You can understand why Ayaan Hirsi Ali has become a lightning rod for controversy in today's world. Islam and its internal struggles—Shia vs. Sunni, clan vs. clan, Wahhabism, radical terrorists, etc.—are all part of the daily news. All are part of the considerations of international politics, as well as global business. That reality makes Infidel worth reading.
As we have often observed in World News and Prophecy, the fomenting conflict between Islam and traditional Western nations and cultures is a natural fit to the end-time prophecies of a north-south pitched battle for control of the Middle East. We recommend our booklet The Middle East in Bible Prophecy for a complete analysis of those prophecies, as well as for an overview of the history of Islam. WNP

You might also be interested in...

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Mumbai Terror Attacks Highlight Global Nature of Threat From Radical Islam

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.

Mumbai Terror Attacks Highlight Global Nature of Threat From Radical Islam

  by Melvin Rhodes Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
After the train bombings in the Indian city of Mumbai (formerly Bombay) on July 11, there was fairly extensive reporting on the terror attacks in the Lansing State Journal, the daily newspaper that serves the state capital of Michigan. The chief suspects, according to the Associated Press article, were “Kashmiri separatists.”
Not once were the words Muslim or Islamic mentioned, in keeping with the tenets of political correctness that still maintain that all religions are equally valid and that Islam is really a religion of peace! However, Kashmiri separatists are all Muslims, fighting to break away from predominantly Hindu India and unite with the Islamic nation of Pakistan.
At the same time, it should be noted that a number of trains were blown up in Mumbai, all within 11 minutes. Simultaneous attacks are a trademark of al-Qaeda. These attacks on the rapid transit system in India's financial capital are very similar to previous attacks in Madrid in 2004 and in London in 2005.
Following the July 11 attacks, security was heightened in New York, America's financial capital. It appears increasingly as if al-Qaeda is targeting financial centers in an attempt to bring down the Western financial system. Mumbai, the financial center at the heart of one of the world's fastest-growing economies, was the most likely target in India for this reason.
The bombings all took place in the rush hour, again copying those in Madrid and London, indicating the bombings are the work of a regional al-Qaeda affiliate, as Muslim militants around the world increasingly work together to achieve the common goal of Islamic domination.
The attacks in Mumbai were just one incident that hit the headlines for one day in what is increasingly being called “The Long War,” a conflict seemingly without end.
Increasingly, it appears that the radical followers of Islam are winning against a Western world that is more and more divided, both between the various governments and also within the individual countries themselves.
The spread of radical Islam is becoming more evident, with Somalia being the latest country to fall under the control of fundamentalists.
Iraq is undergoing civil strife between its two main factions, the followers of Sunni Islam who supported the previous leader, Saddam Hussein, and the majority Shia Muslims who receive much of their support from Iran.
In neighboring Iran, a theocratic government is threatening to develop nuclear weapons to rid the world of Israel. Its president promises a “real holocaust” against the United States and Britain. Iran supports the anti-Western regime in Syria and backs Hamas in the Palestinian territories.
Iran also supports Hezbollah, the group whose increasing rocket attacks on Israeli cities resulted in an Israeli counterattack in Lebanon. This now means that there are three ongoing major conflicts against radical Islam—Israel/Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Commenting on the international nature of the threat from radical Islam, syndicated columnist Cal Thomas wrote: “The turmoil in the Middle East will not stay in the Middle East. This is a world war and the first shots have already been fired in Europe and America” (“Foes Want Israel Gone,” Lansing State Journal, July 24, 2006).
He added: “The latest upheaval in the Middle East may subside but the objectives of those whose aim is Israel's destruction will not. The enemies of Israel, Europe and America believe this is all-out war.”
Further east, it is becoming more clear that Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai controls very little of his country. The Taliban, ousted by U.S.-led coalition forces four years ago, are now back in force and, together with various warlords, control most of the country. The United States has redeployed many of its forces from the country, but U.S. allies Britain, Canada and Holland have filled the gap. These three countries are suffering heavy casualties in another war without end.
Homegrown terrorism
Meanwhile, at home, these same countries are worried about further domestic terror attacks, their homeland security agencies uncovering plot after plot. It can't be long before they fail to uncover plans for another terrorist attack and ordinary people suffer again at the hands of religious fanatics, intent on bringing about a clash of civilizations between the West and Islam.
The attacks in Mumbai came a little over a year after the subway bombings in London.
July 7 was the one-year anniversary of the attacks that killed 52 innocent people. Increasingly concerned that the perpetrators of the 2005 attacks were all British born, fairly affluent Muslims, “no less than eight surveys of Muslim opinion in the United Kingdom” have been conducted within the last 12 months (Daniel Pipes, “Trouble in Londonstan,” New York Sun, July 11, 2006.)
There are nearly 2 million Muslims living in the United Kingdom, out of a total population of about 60 million. Fifty years ago, only a handful of Muslims inhabited Great Britain. Lax immigration policies and an emphasis on multiculturalism have encouraged the development of one of the world's most diverse societies, a condition currently being exploited by militant Islamists.
These surveys show that the vast majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom identify first and foremost with their religion. Only 7 percent in one poll and 12 percent in another said they identified more with Britain than with Islam.
Incredibly, 7 percent endorsed suicide attacks on civilians in the United Kingdom. Of even greater concern, 12 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds, the ones most likely to be suicide bombers, approved of this. Between 16 percent and 21 percent approved of suicide attacks on the British military, while 28 percent of those aged 18 to 24 approved. One percent, or 16,000 people, said they would be willing to blow themselves up in an attack on British civilians aimed at ending “decadent and immoral” Western society.
Cal Thomas observed: “In an online story the London Daily Telegraph subsequently removed ‘for legal reasons,' Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo warned that British Muslims could soon form a state within Britain. Dr. Sookhdeo, a former Muslim, said, ‘in a decade, you will see parts of English cities which are controlled by Muslim clerics and which follow, not the common law, but aspects of Muslim sharia law” (ibid.).
In a July 7 BBC World Service interview with Winston Churchill, the grandson of the wartime leader, Sir Winston Churchill, it was disclosed that 37 percent of British Muslims thought that attacks on British Jews were always justified.
Mr. Churchill also pointed out that the situation was worse in France where 10 percent of the population is already Muslim and 30 percent of those are under 20 years of age. In a generation or two, Mr. Churchill observed, the majority will be Muslim. Ironically, it was the French who first inflicted a major blow against Islamic forces in the Battle of Poitiers in A.D. 732, halting the spread of Islam into Europe.
It should be clear to all that the threat from radical Islam is growing. It should also be noted that a major focus of worldwide terrorism does seem to be on financial targets like London, New York and Mumbai, in a clear attempt to destroy confidence, upon which the Western economic system is built.
Fulfillment of Bible prophecy
In the biblical prophetic book of Revelation, we read an account of what are known as the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, four symbolic horsemen that bring destruction upon the world in the years immediately prior to the second coming of Jesus Christ.
The first horseman rides a white horse and carries a bow, a threatening weapon. This horseman “went out conquering and to conquer” (Revelation 6:2 Revelation 6:2And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given to him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
American King James Version×
). He is followed in rapid succession by the second horseman, who rides a fiery red horse. The first symbolizes false religion, the second, war. One inevitably follows the other. (For a deeper understanding of this, please request our free booklet The Book of Revelation Unveiled .)
Undoubtedly far worse things must come upon the world for us to see the total fulfillment of this passage of Scripture, but we are certainly now seeing a similar pattern emerging, of false religion intent on forcing itself upon the world–and the resultant conflict that is progressively worsening.
The Old Testament book of Daniel also prophesies of an end-time clash of civilizations between the biblical king of the North (a successor to the Roman Empire) and the king of the South (a modern successor to the ancient Egyptian empire of the Ptolemys that ended with Cleopatra in the first century B.C.).
A powerful Islamic force is now starting to emerge that may contribute significantly to the fulfillment of this end-time prophecy. “At the time of the end the king of the South shall attack him [the king of the North]; and the king of the North shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, horsemen and with many ships” (Daniel 11:40 Daniel 11:40And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
American King James Version×
).
It remains to be seen exactly what this “attack” is. Some translations use the word “push.” It could be an economic threat, like cutting off Mideast oil, on which Europe is heavily dependent. It may be terrorism. Whatever it is, it must be big, to bring about a coalition of European nations that sends a powerful military force into the nations of the Middle East.
We need to be aware of the growing threat from Islamic terrorists and the possible implications for the world.
For more information on this, write for our free booklet The Middle East in Bible Prophecy . WNP

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Zimbabwe's Empty Streets

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.

Zimbabwe's Empty Streets

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
Zimbabwe was once the economic powerhouse and breadbasket of southern Africa. Its rich lands allowed the nation to be self sufficient in virtually everything during the days when it was the pariah among nations. Today its economy is in shambles, inflation is in triple digits and starvation and AIDS has sapped the strength and will of its people.

In 2000 I spent several days in the country visiting with some of the people and seeing the remains of a once vital country. There was still some hope that life would get better, but in the four years since more have fled and, worse yet, it seems the will to rise up and push for reforms has all but gone. This article in the Christian Science Monitor has one paragraph that explains why the citizens have not yet appeared in the streets of Harare or Bulawayo…
Nor does it have a figure like Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a unifying moral force in the anti-apartheid struggle. Zimbabwe's churches are divided, as is civil society and the political opposition.
New elections are coming on March 31. Will another sham election arouse the indignation of capable people? We'll see.

http://www.ucg.org/beyond-today/blogs/zimbabwes-empty-streets

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Another Call For Churchill

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.

Another Call For Churchill

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!
Sign In | Sign Up
×
World Magazine Editor Marvin Olasky has a column today that shows the lack of awareness most Americans have of the clear and present danger from nuclear armed nations like Iran or other radical Islamic terror groups.

The current flap over DP World's management of American ports highlights the inadequacies of this war on terror. The muddled thinking that would allow an Arab country access to not just port management but the inner workings of the port security plans is hard to figure. Why would we even want to let this happen? Is there not an American company that could do this job, allowing us to keep it home grown?

The urgency based, on the facts before us, is just not there. Iran is moving closer each day to possessing a nuclear weapon. They have said enough against Israel, America and western values to justify inclusion in the “axis of evil.” Does anyone remember that description?

This morning there was a report that Former United States President Bill Clinton was doing double speak this week with his comments about the Dubai ports deal. While his wife speaks against the deal from her senate perch, he is advising the Dubai government on how to finesse this issue with the public and lawmakers.

America and Britain are whistling past the graveyard. Some want to return to a normal world, thinking it is possible to subdue our enemies through a combination of diplomacy and military intervention. It is likely true that we have bought ourselves some time by invading Iraq and Afghanistan. But the demon is out of the bottle and we are seeing the reality of forces aligned against us, intent on our destruction. They will stop at nothing less.

Meanwhile our culture continues on, oblivious to the fact that it all could suddenly come to an end. The words of Isaiah call us to repent of the sins that overcome us from head to toe. “Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean; put away the evil of your doings from before my eyes. Cease to do evil,…though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow”. There is room and time for repentance God says, but if not, “…if you refuse and rebel, you shall be devoured by the sword”. (Isaiah 1:16 Isaiah 1:16Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before my eyes; cease to do evil;
American King James Version×
, 18, 20)

We don't Winston Churchill today but we have God's word to instruct us and send a wake up call. It is still not too late.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

2015 - A Year of Triumph or Trial for America?

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.

2015 - A Year of Triumph or Trial for America?




After years of bad economic news, some think things are looking up for the United States. But are they? What troubling signs are on the horizon?

A man holding an American flag flapping in the wind.
Has America passed, or is it about to pass, that point of no return?

Source: Chandler Erisman/Snapwiresnaps
Millions of Americans have seen reasons to believe that 2015 is on track to being better than recent years. Economic forecasts are up. Crime is down. Lower oil prices translate into hundreds of dollars more per year in consumers’ pockets.
Yet while this is all good, should we also be paying attention to troubling signs on the horizon?
To be sure, some signs do indeed look promising. After the economic crisis of 2008-2009 and several years of sluggish recovery, U.S. economists are nearly unanimous in the estimates of robust economic growth in 2015, with most expecting 3 percent or greater.
This would translate into more good news for the job market. The unemployment rate is expected to continue to decline, with tens of thousands of new jobs created each month. And the gradual tightening of the labor force should give U.S. workers more leverage in wage negotiations, finally driving up wages that have been stagnant for years.
A solid growth rate should also translate into stock and bond market gains, as an improving economy translates into higher earnings for companies. A growing economy would prompt the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, which would help bond investors.
As mentioned, the nation can take some satisfaction in an improved crime situation. Federal Bureau of Investigation figures show a striking but positive trend: The rate of violent crime has dropped by nearly half since 1993. FBI data shows a decline in violent crime from a rate of 747 incidents per 100,000 in 1993 to 387 incidents per 100,000 in 2012, the most recent year for which complete data has been published.
Nearly every type of violent crime declined over the past 20 years, with homicides down 51 percent, forcible rape down 35 percent and robberies down 56 percent. Property crimes, such as burglary and vandalism, also dropped sharply.
Some U.S. cities are the safest they’ve been in decades. New York City of the 1970s was considered one of the most crime-infested cities in the nation. Since that time, however, the city’s crime rate has plummeted to where it is now considered safer than Dallas or Houston (Justin Wolfers, “Perceptions Haven’t Caught Up to Decline in Crime,” The New York Times , Sept. 16, 2014).
The good news is something to rejoice about. But before we start celebrating too loudly, we should ask ourselves: Are we seeing the complete picture? Or could we be closing our eyes to dangers we’d rather not think about?

Not-so-rosy economic figures

While some economic figures are encouraging, a number of others are highly sobering. For example, a Jan. 13, 2015, report by Jim Clifton, CEO of Gallup, Inc., noted at the Gallup website that over the last six years, 70,000 more businesses have shut their doors than have opened.
He went on to explain: “When new businesses aren’t being born, the free enterprise system and jobs decline . . . Without a growing entrepreneurial economy, there are no new good jobs. That means declining revenues and smaller salaries to tax, followed by declining aid for the elderly and poor and declining funding for the military, for education, for infrastructure—declining revenues for everything.”
Going hand-in-hand with this, a New York Times article last year reported that over the previous decade, “the inflation-adjusted net worth for the typical household” had declined 36 percent (Anna Bernasek, “The Typical Household, Now Worth a Third Less,” July 26, 2014).
A Jan. 16, 2015, Washington Post article noted the following shocking fact: “For the first time in at least 50 years, a majority of U.S. public school students come from low-income families . . . a statistic that has profound implications for the nation”(Lyndsey Layton, “Majority of U.S. Public School Students Are in Poverty”).
Further, a CNSnews.com headline on Dec. 10, 2014, stated, “65 Percent of Children Live in Households on Federal Aid Programs.” The total number, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures, was more than 40 million.
Especially troubling is the skyrocketing U.S. government debt. According to the U.S. Treasury website, as of Jan. 1, 2005, total federal debt was just under $7.6 trillion. A decade later, at the beginning of 2015, debt stood at more than $18 trillion —a staggering increase of almost 140 percent, and more debt than the nation had accumulated in its entire previous history of almost 230 years!
Sadly, such figures are the tip of the iceberg in terms of the nation’s true financial picture. Making matters worse, on Feb. 2 President Obama presented a proposed 2016 fiscal year budget that would add another $1.44 trillion in taxes and another $6 trillion in debt over the next decade.

An island in a sea of turmoil

In spite of its financial problems, America could be likened to an island of relative peace and tranquility in a seething cauldron of worldwide unrest, where violence and hatred seem to be escalating everywhere.
The new year was barely one week old when two French-born Islamic terrorists of Algerian descent, brothers Cherif and Said Quache, stormed into the Paris offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on Jan. 7. Using automatic weapons with military precision, they gunned down 10 journalists and cartoonists, plus two policemen.
As they murdered a wounded Muslim policeman they shouted, “The prophet has been avenged!” Apparently they thought it was their Muslim duty to avenge any insult to the founder of Islam.
The murders had a chilling effect on press freedom, long a core belief of Western democracies. Major news organizations immediately began rethinking their editorial policies. At CNN, senior editorial director Richard Griffiths told staffers worldwide that Charlie Hebdo cartoons were not being shown on any CNN platforms, encouraging them instead to “verbally describe the cartoons in detail” (quoted at Politico, Jan. 7, 2015).
The Islamist terror organization al-Qaeda’s affiliate group in Yemen took responsibility for the Paris killings, which the French now refer to as their 9/11. Al-Qaeda has shown its ability to strike the major Western democracies, with nearly 3,000 killed in the 9/11 attacks on America in 2001 and 52 in England with the 2005 London subway bombings.
The sensational news of the attacks in France overshadowed other terrorist incidents that day—suicide bombings in Iraq that killed 23 people and a car bomb in Yemen that killed 38 and injured more than 60 others. These followed attacks in which an estimated 2,000 people were slaughtered by the Islamist group Boko Haram in northern Nigeria Jan. 3.
Very few realize that the Bible sitting on their bookshelf has something to say about these events. Speaking through Moses, God foretold events that would befall ancient Israel—and its modern-day descendants, particularly the major English-speaking peoples—for national rejection of His law:
“But if you will not listen to Me, and will not do all these commandments, and if you shall despise My statutes, or if your soul hates My judgments . . . I will even appoint terror over you, consumption, and burning fever, consuming the eyes and causing sorrow of heart . . . And I will set My face against you, and you shall be slain before your enemies”(Leviticus:26:14-17, Modern King James Version, emphasis added throughout).
Could it be that we’re seeing these ominous punishments begin to be played out in America today? What do such growing trends portend for the nation’s future?

Failing schools reduce national competitiveness

For the past few decades, America’s failing educational institutions have been an embarrassment to the nation and a blot on its national pride.
A recent Washington Times article described American public schools as “in a free fall,”with U.S. schools now ranking 29th in the world. This from the nation that earlier put man on the moon and has for decades led the world in finding cures for killer diseases.
Slovakia, Russia and Vietnam have joined the ranks of China, India, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea in the list of nations surpassing U.S. schools in the quality of education and the caliber of its graduates.
And now comes evidence that many American college graduates lack the skills to compete even in an average U.S. work environment. In mid-January, The Wall Street Journal reported that as many as four in ten U.S. graduates lack the reasoning skills to manage white-collar work.
The Collegiate Learning Assessment Plus exam, given to 32,000 college seniors at 169 U.S. colleges and universities, measures reasoning ability needed in typical U.S. managerial environments. It noted that many students start college at a deficit in reasoning, making it that much harder to catch up by the time they graduate.
“‘Even if there is notable growth over four years, many students are starting at such a low point that they may still not be proficient at the point of graduation,’ said Jessalyn James, a program manager at the Council for Aid to Education, which administered the test” (Douglas Belkin , “Test Finds College Graduates Lack Skills for White-Collar Jobs,” The Wall Street Journal , Jan. 16, 2015).
The implications for an America competing in a global economy could be disastrous. As nations such as China and India graduate more trained engineers, scientists, business managers and computer experts, American competitiveness will suffer.

Alarming increase in mental illness

Not well publicized is the dramatic rise of mental illness in America today. No less an authority than Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, had this to say in a June 23, 2011, New York Review of Books piece titled “The Epidemic of Mental Illness: Why?”:
“The tally of those who are so disabled by mental disorders that they qualify for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) increased nearly two and a half times between 1987 and 2007 —from 1 in 184 Americans to 1 in 76. For children, the rise is even more startling— a thirty-five-fold increase in the same two decades.”
Today, young people by the millions are experiencing the onset of clinical depression, among the most debilitating of mental illnesses resulting in thousands of suicides annually. Speaking to the National Press Club in 1998, Martin Seligman, then-president of the American Psychological Association, reported that the average age for the onset of depression had decreased from 29 to 15.
Antidepressant use in the United States has increased nearly 400 percent in the last two decades, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), making antidepressants the most frequently used class of medications by Americans ages 18-44. By 2008, 23 percent of women ages 40-59 were taking antidepressants, the CDC reported.
It seems every other person in the country is on some type of antidepressant these days. What does it portend for America’s future with depression and other mental illnesses on the rise?
And how much of this may be attributed to a sobering prophecy that applies to our time today found in Deuteronomy:28:28? Speaking to the ancient Israelites—and their modern-day descendants—about the consequences of disobedience to His law, God tells them, “The Lord will strike you with blindness and madness and confusion of heart.”

Rising racial tensions creating a divided nation

The election of Barack Obama as the first African-American president brought hope to millions that race relations in America would enter the final stage of healing, marking the start of a new era in the nation.
That optimism soon vanished. Annual Wall Street Journal/ NBC News polls show that positive views of race relations peaked among African Americans at 66 percent in 2010, one year after Obama took office. Then opinions took a steady downturn so that by July 2013 only 38 percent thought race relations were good—worse than the 40 percent in 2007 before Obama.
Perceptions of race relations dropped even lower with the highly publicized 2014 killings of two black men by white police officers, one in Ferguson, Missouri, and the other in New York City, along with grand juries in both cases deciding not to indict the officers. In another Wall Street Journal/ NBC poll in mid-December 2014, only 35 percent of African-American respondents rated race relations as good, while 63 percent rated them as bad.
The change in perceptions among white Americans was even more dramatic, having risen from 59 percent seeing race relations as good in 2007 to a peak of 79 percent considering them so in late 2009 and then plunging to only 40 percent now feeling this way, as of December 2014 (Reid Epstein, “Poll: Views of Race Relations Worse Than Before Obama Took Office,” Washington Wire, blogs.wsj.com, Dec. 17, 2014)
It would seem that America’s long-running racial divisions have not improved nearly as much as we would have expected since the early 1960s civil rights struggles. This does not bode well for the future of the country. As Jesus Christ Himself stated, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand” (Matthew:12:25, New International Version).
Certainly, the U.S. is not the only nation with significant gulfs between racial groups. But we could ask ourselves to what extent will smoldering racial tensions lead to the weakening of the world’s leading democracy?

How much longer?

Some will point out that America has faced crises before. One can’t forget the grim situation the nation faced in the 1930s, when worldwide economic depression crippled the U.S. economy with 25 percent unemployment in 1933. The nation came through a decade later when, roused from isolationist slumber by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, it mobilized its human and material resources to defeat the Axis powers.
But other observers also correctly point out the differences in the character of the American people then compared to today. With the nation’s flagrant disregard for morality and God’s righteous law, does America have what it takes to pull through today’s challenges?
Moses’ warning to ancient Israel is especially relevant to 21st-century America. Read it in Deuteronomy 28, where God promised blessings for obedience and curses for violating His laws. God dealt patiently with ancient Israel, and He will deal patiently with us today—but only to a point. Has America passed, or is it about to pass, that point of no return?
Individually, none of us can change the course of a nation bent on increasingly turning away from God. But each of us can personally heed God’s command given through the prophet Isaiah: “Seek the Lord while He may be found, call upon Him while He is near. Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; let him return to the Lord, and He will have mercy on him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon” (Isaiah:55:6-7).
May we have the wisdom to turn from our human ways that lead to suffering and death (Proverbs:14:12; Proverbs:16:25) and choose, as we’re told to in Deuteronomy:30:19, the way that leads to blessings and life!

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Natalee Holloway and Modern Slavery

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/ or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here. Please follow me here.

Natalee Holloway and Modern Slavery


The Bible predicts that this trafficking of human beings will only get worse in the future and that Jesus Christ upon His return will have to put an end to this practice of slavery.



Remember Natalee Holloway and the island country of Aruba? Those were names in the news almost daily in the summer of 2005 as Natalee Holloway's parents frantically searched for their eighteen-year-old daughter who disappeared on that island. Natalee went to Aruba for a post-graduation celebration with her high school classmates, but never returned.
Now three years later, the case took a bizarre twist. The prime suspect in the early days of the case did an interview on television in which he said that he sold Natalee for 10 thousand dollars to a foreigner who said he liked blondes. He said that man who took her abroad and she has never been seen again.
Later, that same suspect told the interviewer that his story was made up—a lie. Whether true or not, Natallee Holloway has not been found. And she was one of hundreds of thousands who have disappeared.
Every year around 800,000 people are trafficked internationally. How horrible would it be to you to find yourself in handcuffs or leg irons being taken to some strange place. More frightening yet is for a girl to be sold into sex slavery. It is estimated that there are between 12 and 27 million people enslaved at this very time throughout the world.
14,000-17,000 people are brought into the United States annually as slaves. And, in fact, every continent on earth has people held against their will.
The Bible predicts that this trafficking of human beings will only get worse in the future and that Jesus Christ upon His return will have to put an end to this damnable practice of slavery (Revelation:18:12-13; Isaiah:27:12-13).
Let's pray for that day when people held against their will may be free. And, let's pray, that one day soon, Natalee's parents may find their beautiful daughter alive and back home again!
For GN Magazine, I'm Gary Antion.
Nobody has commented yet. Be the first to kick off the discussion!

Friday, January 9, 2015

The Paris Terror Attacks

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/  or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.


The Paris Terror Attacks



Printer-friendly version



People in front of Eiffel Tower at night.

Source: Ed Gregory/Stokpic.com
The new year has started violently in Paris. Twelve people were killed on Wednesday, January 7 in an deliberate terrorist attack by men claiming connection with Al Qaeda. It was a barbaric ruthless attack. One video showed a policeman being gunned down on a sidewalk.
The attack came on the office of Charlie Hebdo a satirical weekly newspaper that regular lampoons Islam. The publication had been under threat and was receiving light police protection. Cartoonists and writers were killed in the slaughter virtually wiping out the editorial staff of the paper.
France has Europe’s largest Muslim population and terrorism and pressure from radical Islam is a continual threat to the tolerant and liberal French culture. France’s reaction to this act will be a critical indicator of what future relations between the growing Muslim population and traditional French institutions will be. Attacking a newspaper and killing its staff strikes at values of free speech, fraternity and liberty–bedrock values across the European Community.
Neither France nor Europe needs an attack like this. Should others follow you could expect a reaction that could escalate relations between the Muslim and native populations. The EU system is struggling economically. It is still figuring out how to react to Russia’s incursions into Ukraine.
Last year Pope Francis told the EU Parliament in Strasbourg that Europe gave "a general impression of weariness and aging, of a Europe which is now a ‘grandmother,’ no longer fertile and vibrant”. That’s not a ringing endorsement from the pontiff. Attacks like this will one day bring Europe to an action that will rouse latent forces. That time isn’t now but it is coming.
This is a sad moment for the City of Light and the families of those who have been killed. May God’s grace be upon them at this time.

Thursday, January 8, 2015

The Jihadist Worldview: What's Behind the Mideast Brutality?

From http://el-paso.ucg.org/  or call 1-888-886-8632. Please follow this site here.


The Jihadist Worldview: What's Behind the Mideast Brutality?





The brutality of the Islamic State and various terrorist organizations is shocking and horrifying—beheadings, suicide attacks, slaughter of prisoners and women forced into sexual slavery. What's really behind such barbarism? The truth may surprise you!

Muslim militant with rifle.
Source: zabelin/123RF
The headlines out of the Middle East in recent months have been horrifying—American and British hostages beheaded, captured prisoners executed in the thousands, women forced or sold into a lifetime of sexual slavery, children brutally murdered and communities starved to death or murdered in cold blood for refusing to change their religion.
Much of the world is shocked by such brutality, and rightfully so. It seems incomprehensible to the Western mind.
What's driving such cruelty, a barbarism not seen in our lifetimes? If we are to understand, we need to cast off the blinders of political correctness and unflinchingly face the facts.
In reality, the answer is simple. Those who are behind these horrors share a common denominator. They are unapologetic in saying they are doing what they are told to do by their religion— Islam.
And while it is true that many Muslims are peaceful, and are equally horrified by these events, all we have to do is look at the words of the perpetrators of such atrocities to understand their motivations. They clearly and proudly state that they are doing what their religion tells them to do.

A religion of peace?

Ever since the horrific hijacked-airliner terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (with another jet apparently supposed to crash into the White House or U.S. Capitol building), Western leaders have gone out of their way to describe Islam as a religion of peace.
For example, just six days after those attacks that killed almost 3,000 Americans, then-President George W. Bush, speaking at the Islamic Center of Washington D.C., said: "These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith . . . The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam.  That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace" (emphasis added throughout).
In a speech to the United Nations on Sept. 24, 2014, U.S. President Barack Obama stated: "The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them—there is only us, because millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country. So we reject any suggestion of a clash of civilizations."
In a speech on Sept. 3, 2014—ironically, the day after the Islamic State (IS) released a video showing the beheading of American journalist Steven Sotloff—U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry applauded Islam as a "peaceful religion based on the dignity of all human beings."  He then explained that "the real face of Islam is . . .one where Muslim communities are advocating for universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the most basic freedom to practice one's faith openly and freely."
On Sept. 24, following the brutal decapitation of British hostage David Haines, British Prime Minister David Cameron insisted that his murderers "have nothing to do with the great religion of Islam, a religion of peace, a religion that inspires daily acts of kindness and generosity."

Who is a more reliable authority on Islam?

While these and other Western leaders repeatedly claim that Islam is a peaceful religion, we should also remind ourselves that those actively involved in committing these atrocities have spent their entire lifetimes immersed in Islamic belief and culture.
We should also note that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the declared caliph of the Islamic State, holds a doctorate in Islamic studies from the Islamic University of Baghdad—distinguishing him as highly knowledgeable of Islamic law, history and culture. Unlike these Western leaders, he is thoroughly familiar with the beliefs of Islam and teachings of its holy book, the Quran.
As caliph—supreme ruler of the new Islamic nation carved out of Syria and Iraq—his determinations of what is allowable or forbidden is the law of the land. And as recent headlines have shown, Al-Baghdadi and his followers, like Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda before them, see no conflict between their tactics of murder and mayhem and their practice of Islam. In fact, they boast that what they do is the practice of Islam.
What, then, is the truth? Is Islam a religion of peace, as these politicians say, or is it something different? To understand the answer, we need to examine Islam's holy book, the Quran.

Islam—the supreme and only true religion

What are some of the teachings of the Quran that are leading to violence and bloodshed around the world?
The clear teaching of the Quran is that Islam is the supreme and only true religion, and that eventually the entire world will come under Islamic rule.
For example, Surah 61:9 states: "It is He [ Allah ] who has sent for His apostle [ Muhammad ] with guidance and the true faith [ Islam ] , so that he may exalt it above all religions, much as the idolaters may dislike it" (all quotes from the Dawood translation, 1999). In the Quran, "idolaters" refers to all who practice non-Islamic religion—including Christians and Jews.
In line with this belief in the supremacy of Islam, Surah 2:193 gives this clear command: "Fight against them until idolatry is no more and [ Allah's ] religion reigns supreme." Again, "idolatry" in the Quran refers to any religion other than Islam, which would include Christianity and Judaism and any other belief system. To those who follow this verse—and there are millions who do—if you don't worship Allah by the dictates of Muhammad, you are considered an idolater and therefore a legitimate target of this command.
In the worldview of Islamic scholars and leaders, the world is divided into two spheres—the sphere or lands of dar al-Islam, meaning "the domain of Islam" (where Islam is dominant) and dar al-harb, meaning "the domain of war." A fundamental aspect of this worldview is that all non-Muslim lands must eventually be absorbed or conquered by Islam, preferably by peaceful conversion, but by force if necessary—thus they are "the domain of war."
Another aspect of this that bears bringing out is that most of the Muslim world is united against Israel because it is considered an abomination for land that was once dar al-Islam, part of the land of Islam,to revert to dar al-harb, to fall back under control of the infidel (Christians or Jews).
This is a key reason why Muslims are so determined to bring the physical territory of Israel back under Muslim domination. Keep in mind that the Palestine Liberation Organization was founded in 1964, three years before Israel captured the West Bank and Jerusalem in the 1967 Six-Day War—so Muslim determination to "liberate" Israeli lands long predates Israel's control of these areas and extends to all of Israel, period.
This is why Muslim leaders openly boast of their desire to liberate the land "from the sea to the sea"— from the Dead Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, meaning no more Israel. This is why the founding documents of terror organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah openly call for the elimination of Israel.
Western governments, failing to understand this Muslim belief, regularly pressure Israel to negotiate with Hamas and the Palestinian Authority for a peaceful solution. But in fact there is no peaceful solution when the negotiating partners believe with all their heart and soul that Israel's land belongs to them and that it must be ethnically cleansed of Jews—as stated repeatedly by Hamas and Palestinian Authority leaders.

Jihad— holy war against non-believers

If Islam is to become the supreme and only true religion in the world as taught by the Quran, how is that goal to be accomplished? The answer is jihad or holy war. The Quran commands violence and conquest to spread Islam. It contains literally dozens of such commands, but we'll quote just a few:
Surah 9:5 states: "When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them."
Surah 9:73 reads: "Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate."
Surah 9:123 commands: "Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that [ Allah ] is with the righteous."
Harvard University professor of government Samuel Huntington, commenting on the disproportionate involvement of Muslims in warfare and terrorism around the globe, coined the phrase "the bloody borders of Islam" in his 1997 book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. At that pre-9/11 time he had no idea how prophetic the phrase would be.
In the 2005 book Religion, Culture and International Conflict: A Conversation (Michael Cromartie, editor), Professor Huntington wrote: "While groups from all religions have engaged in various forms of violence and terrorism, the figures make it clear that in the past decade Muslims have been involved in far more of these activities than people of other religions . . .
If you look around the Muslim world you see that in the 1990s Muslims were fighting non-Muslims in Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Chechnya, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kashmir, Indonesia, the Philippines, the Middle East, Sudan, Nigeria, and other places. Muslims have been fighting one another also" (p. 5).
He went on to note that in the year 2000, 23 of the world's 32 armed conflicts involved Muslims. Similar numbers hold true today. A glance at a world map shows that nearly all of the world's wars are taking place around the edges of the Muslim world where Islam is pressing outward against non-Muslims. Whereas the Bible teaches us to love our neighbors (Leviticus:19:18; Matthew:22:39), the Quran teaches Muslims to "make war on the infidels who dwell around you"— to fight your neighbor.
It's also worth noting that many Muslims believe that the only sure way to enter paradise (in their view of the afterlife) is to become a martyr fighting for Islam. They draw this belief from Surah 22:58: "As for those that have fled their homes in the cause of [Allah] and afterwards died or were slain, [Allah] will surely make a generous provision for them [in paradise]. [Allah] is the most munificent provider. He will surely admit them with a welcome that will please them. All-knowing is [Allah], and gracious."
In Islamic thinking, as soon as a martyr sheds his first drop of blood, he is guaranteed a place in paradise. And when he arrives, he has waiting for him 72 young, dark-eyed, beautiful virgins to be his perpetual companions in paradise. This is one reason so many young Muslim men are willing to die as suicide bombers—because they are guaranteed entry into paradise as soon as they blow themselves up, since they are dying in the cause of jihad.
The Quran also says that Allah will punish those who do not wage jihad as he commands. Surah 9:39 warns: "If you do not go to war, [ Allah ] will punish you sternly, and will replace you by other men." In other words, if you're a Muslim and don't wage jihad, you will be punished and Allah will choose someone else to fight in your place.

Using terror in waging jihad

The Quran also commands using terror and cruelty in waging jihad. Surah 8:59-60 states: "Let not the unbelievers think that they will ever get away. They have not the power so to do. Muster against them all the men and cavalry at your command, so that you may strike terror into the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them who are unknown to you but known to Allah."
This is why the Sunni fighters of the Islamic State are so viciously cruel. Knowing this verse, they use terror to strike fear into their enemies to demoralize them and cause them to give up their will to fight. Those whom they capture—Shiites whom they consider apostates or non-Muslims—they brutally execute in accordance with what they read in their holy book. 
The Quran even mentions specific methods to sow terror, which the Islamic State fighters use. Surah 8:12 states: "[Allah] revealed his will to the angels, saying: 'I shall be with you. Give courage to the believers. I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers!'"
So what the Quran tells them to do, they do. When their holy book tells them to strike off heads, they do exactly that.
The civilized world has been horrified to see Islamic State fighters, like al-Qaeda fighters and Iraqi terror groups before them, brutally decapitate captive soldiers, as well as Western journalists and aid workers. Perhaps you have seen clips from some of the beheading videos shown on news reports or posted on the Internet. You may have wondered, as I did, what the Arabic-language shouting and chanting signified.
I already knew the meaning of the shouts of "Allahu Akbar"—"Allah is great" or, more properly, "Allah is greater" (than any who would oppose them). With a little research I learned the significance of the chanting often accompanying the shouts. The murderers are chanting verses like the one above telling them to behead infidels. They are simply quoting their scriptures in the Quran.
Yet Western leaders assure us, as President Obama did in a Nov. 16 White House statement after the beheading of American hostage Peter Kassig, that such acts "represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith . . ."
Another Surah that illustrates Allah's cruelty is Surah 5:34-35: "Those that make war against [Allah] and His apostle [Mohammad] and spread disorder in the land shall be slain or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the land. They shall be held up to shame in this world and sternly punished in the hereafter."
Here Allah commands torture, crippling and maiming of prisoners. Crucifixion is a horrible form of torture and execution, and they practice it with relish. A brief search of the Internet will produce hundreds of photos showing Islamists carrying out and celebrating such practices.

Slavery and the Quran

What does the Quran teach about slavery? Although little is said about it in Western media, slavery remains alive and well in parts of the Muslim world. While the slave trade in the Americas during the 1600s, 1700s and 1800s has been rightfully condemned, the focus has largely been on the white slave owners and slave traders, with little said of the Arab Muslims who first enslaved Africans and sold them to whites.
This, too, was approved in the Quran. Surah 47:4 says: "When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly." Those who follow the Quran literally have long understood this to mean that when Muslims defeat their enemies, they are allowed to either kill them or enslave them.
According to early Muslim writings, Muhammad—who is viewed as the ideal man whom Muslims are to emulate—sold, traded and confiscated slaves, making himself a slave trader.
A particularly appalling aspect of recent Muslim conquests is women and girls being taken captive to be used as sexual slaves. This happened with the capture of Yazidi towns in northern Iraq by the Islamic State and the kidnapping of hundreds of schoolgirls by the Islamic Boko Haram movement in Nigeria. This, too, is specifically allowed in the Quran. Notice these verses:
Surah 23:1-6 says: "Blessed are the believers, who are humble in their prayers, who avoid profane talk, and give alms to the destitute, who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave-girls, for these are lawful to them . . .)."
Surah 33:50 states: "We [that is, Allah speaking of himself in the plural] well know the duties We have imposed on the faithful concerning their wives and slave-girls. ( We grant you this privilege [satisfying their sexual desires with slave girls]) so that none may blame you."
A Nov. 5, 2014, report by the International Business Times was headlined "Shocking: ISIS Official 'Slave' Price List Shows Yazidi, Christian Girls Aged '1 to 9' Being Sold for $172." The article went on to describe a price list for sexual slaves on an Islamist website: "In the name of Allah, most gracious and merciful. We have received news that the demand in women and cattle markets has sharply decreased and that will [affect] Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of the Mujaheddin [jihadist fighter] in the battlefield. We have made some changes. Below are the prices of Yazidi and Christian women."
At the same time a video posted online appeared to show Islamic State fighters at what one of them called "slave market day" while quoting Surah 23:1-6 (cited above). The men discuss prices for girls and women from $100-300 depending on the age and eye color—with green or blue eyes bringing a higher price.
An October online edition of Dabiq magazine (published by an Islamic State jihadist group) boasted after the capture of the Iraqi town of Sinjar that "the enslaved Yazidi families are now sold by the Islamic State soldiers." It then explained that "the Yazidi women and children were then divided according to the Shariah [Islamic law] amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the Sinjar operations." Thus, as war booty, they were divided up and sold as pieces of property.

Turning a blind eye to the grim reality

The sad truth about the Middle East today is that we are seeing a revival of the original Islam Muhammad brought to the world in the seventh century.
Muhammad's new religion caught fire, fueled by power and plunder. The Islamic State is repeating Muhammad's early conquests—burning churches, looting monasteries, enslaving and forcibly converting the powerless, and callously executing those who stand up to them. It is vigorously enforcing sharia law—cutting off the hands of thieves, stoning adulterers and blasphemers, whipping criminals and banning anything that stands in the way of Islam.
In defiance of the major Western powers, it has brutally butchered American and British citizens, decapitating them and posting videos of the murders on the Internet for the world to see. The message is unmistakable: Allah is on their side, and they have nothing to fear from the major world powers.
Until Western leaders wake up from their willful blindness and face the grim reality of the jihadist worldview that is motivating the Islamic State as well as Hamas, Hezbollah and countless other groups and movements, that part of the world will remain a powder keg waiting to explode and take down much of modern civilization with it. And shockingly, Bible prophecy indicates that is the likely outcome to which events in that region are heading.